Local Chapter 9 Bankruptcy Filings

Mary Conner PoolMy last blog post gave a brief overview of a Chapter 9 bankruptcy.  In this post, I will discuss a couple of “local” Chapter 9 filings and some noteworthy issues that arose in those cases.

Bankruptcy for Municipalities

As I noted in my last post, a Chapter 9 bankruptcy is available to financially stressed municipalities.  In the over 60 years since Congress first provided a way for municipalities to file bankruptcy, less that 500 municipalities have actually filed petitions.  Interestingly, two of those more recent petitions have originated from Alabama.  The City of Prichard filed for Chapter 9 protection in 2009 in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama.  Two years later, in 2011, Jefferson County, Alabama filed in the Northern District.

Prichard, AL Bankruptcy

The City of Prichard filed for Chapter 9 protection in great part due to large pension obligations the city owed to former employees.  Prichard had also filed for bankruptcy in 1999, also due to issues with the employee’s pensions as well as unpaid bills. In the 1999 case, a $16 million increase to the pension fund was set forth in their bankruptcy plan.  However, this increase was not implemented by the city and their pension problem just grew larger.  In 2009, there was no more money in the pension fund and the city stopped issuing pension checks to the former employee retirees.  Litigation arising out of this caused the city to file another Chapter 9 in 2009.

The following year, a group of City of Prichard employees filed a motion to dismiss the Chapter 9 case because the creditors said that Prichard was not authorized to file for Chapter 9 under the Alabama Code.  They argued that the Alabama Code required a municipality to have “refunding or funding bond debt” to be authorized to file.  The bankruptcy court agreed and dismissed that case.  The City of Prichard appealed that decision to the United States District Court, which then asked the Alabama Supreme Court to answer the question of whether Prichard was eligible to file for Chapter 9 protection even though it did not have any debt in the form of these bonds.  The Supreme Court ruled that the City was eligible to file its bankruptcy.  The Supreme Court of Alabama noted that the statute in question also authorizes “each county, city or town, or municipal authority organized under Article 9, Chapter 47 o f [Title 11] " to file for federal bankruptcy protection, and that the legislature clearly intended every municipality to be able to file under Chapter 9.  Subsequently, the bankruptcy judge withdrew the order to dismiss the case.

Jefferson County, AL Bankruptcy

The other recent Alabama municipal bankruptcy was Jefferson County, Alabama’s 2011 filing.  This was the largest Chapter 9 filing until 2013 when Detroit filed.  The county had over $4.2 billion in liabilities.  This debt was caused by a variety of issues, including allegations of bribery and corruption.  The debt was mainly non-recourse warrants issued to finance a sewer system.

As in Pritchard’s bankruptcy, creditors moved to dismiss the case on the same grounds as in the Prichard case.  The creditors thought that Jefferson County was not authorized to file under the Alabama Code.  Judge Bennett, in the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District in Birmingham, rejected this argument and ruled that Jefferson County was authorized to file under the Alabama Code.  After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled in City of Prichard v. Balzer, discussed above, any doubts about the decision were quieted.

Though Chapter 9 bankruptcies are not frequent, Chapter 9 is an important and necessary form of bankruptcy protection.  If you have questions about your personal financial situation and want to know what Chapter of bankruptcy is right for you, please call one of our offices and set up a free consultation today.

Share This Page

Bond & Botes Law Offices

At Bond & Botes, we now offer full service bankruptcy consultation and filing over the phone or by video from the comfort and safety of your home or office. Please call 1-877-581-3396 or click here to setup your free phone or video consultation.

The lawyers at the Bond & Botes affiliated offices serve clients at offices in Anniston, Birmingham, Mobile, Montgomery, Opelika, Decatur, Huntsville, Florence, Haleyville and Gadsden, Alabama; Vicksburg, Hattiesburg and Jackson, Mississippi. Read our disclaimer here. You can view our Privacy Policy here.

Alabama Offices

Birmingham

2107 5th Avenue North
Age-Herald Building
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Phone: (205) 802-2200


Shelby County Location
15 Southlake Lane, Ste 140
Birmingham, AL 35244
Phone: (205) 802-2200


Florence Location
121 S. Court Street
Florence, AL 35630
Phone: (256) 760-1010


Huntsville Location
225 Pratt Avenue NE
Huntsville, AL 35801
Phone: (256) 539-9899


Montgomery Location
311 Catoma Street
Montgomery, AL 36104
Phone: (334) 264-3363


Decatur Location
605 Bank Street NE
Decatur, AL 35601
Phone: (256) 355-2447


Haleyville Location
914 19th St.
Haleyville, AL 35565
Phone: (256) 760-1010


Gadsden Location
430-B Chestnut Street
Gadsden, AL 35901
Phone: (256) 485-0195


Opelika Location
216 South 8th Street
Opelika 36801
Phone: (334) 264-3363


Anniston Location
1302 Noble St #2C
Anniston, AL 36201
Phone: (256) 485-0195


Cullman Location
200 Second Avenue SW
Cullman, AL 35055
Phone: (256) 739-9866


Mississippi Offices

Jackson Location
120 Southpointe Dr., A
Byram, MS 39272
Phone: (601) 353-5000


Hattiesburg Location
607 Corinne St, Ste B8
Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Phone: (601) 353-5000


Vicksburg Location
1212 Farmer Street
Vicksburg, MS 39180
Phone: (601) 353-5000

© 2024 by Bond & Botes Law Offices. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy